February 1, 2026

Our Days of Noah

~THE WORLDWIDE FLOOD WAS NEVER THE PERMANENT SOLUTION~

US-Israeli false flag gas attack unravels



Source: Information Clearing House

This is where it all started: The Israeli intelligence front the
Debkafile
, which is the source of the story that implicated
the Assad government and/or its military in the gas attack on
East Ghouta and now forms the basis for the war on Syria.


DEBKAfile’s military sources affirm that, just as the Assad
brothers orchestrated the chemical shell attack on Syrian
civilians, so too did Hizballah’s leader Hassan Nasrallah
set in motion the rocket attack on Israel. – ‘The
sarin shells fired on Damascus – by Syrian 4th Division’s
155th Brigade – were followed by rockets on Israel and car
bombings in Lebanon
‘, Debkafile, 24 August 2013

Let’s try
sum up what we do know:

On the 21
August from a suburb of Damascus, Douma (or Duma) then under
‘rebel’ control, two missiles were fired at another ‘rebel’
controlled suburb of Damascus called East Ghouta, killing an
unknown number of people, including children. It is assumed now
that some kind of nerve gas or at least poison gas was used. The
New York Times have documented this

here
, although they’ve moved some of the locations on the
map. In this regard how does the NYT reconcile their take on the
source of the missiles with the Mossad version, which makes them
artillery shells fired from the mountains in the South ( see the
Mossad version below, such as it is). This is confirmed by Pepe
Escobar’s report of
Russian satellite evidence.

Within
hours, or even minutes, videos of the alleged effects of the
attack were circulating on the Web and without a pause for a
breath (let alone any evidence), led by the UK and followed
closely by France, they were blaming the Assad government for
the attack and pressing for an immediate attack on Syria, with
or without authorisation from the UN Security Council.

For more
on this see this

Wiki
, where details on the launch of the two missiles can be
found. It’s not exactly a coherent presentation as it’s an
assemblage of links and descriptions, but it looks like the
missiles were launched from a Syrian Special Forces base in
Douma (or Duma) then occupied by the ‘rebels’.

The ‘Evidence’

For
several days, in fact until today, 28 August, there was no
evidence offered in the mainstream media that confirmed the
allegations made by the US, the UK and France. Then a story
released by the Israeli Mossad intelligence service to the
German magazine Focus on the 24 August got picked up by
the MSM. Today the 28th a report in the London

Guardian
newspaper tells us that the ‘evidence’ was
from an Israeli source, specifically the 8200 intelligence unit
of the Israeli Defence Forces,

“which
specialises in electronic surveillance, intercepted a
conversation between Syrian officials regarding the use of
chemical weapons, an unnamed former Mossad official told
Focus. The content of the conversation was relayed to the
US, the ex-official said.” – The Guardian, 28
August 2013

A more
complete article on the Israeli connection can be found in a
Times of Israel
article dated 27 August:

It was
Brun, the IDF’s top intelligence analyst, who in April
shocked the international community by declaring that the
army was quite certain that Assad had used chemical weapons
against rebel forces in Syria in March.

This
time, too, Israeli military intelligence has reportedly
played a key role in providing evidence of Assad’s chemical
weapons use. On Friday, Israel’s Channel 2 reported
that the weapons were fired by the 155th Brigade of the 4th
Armored Division of the Syrian Army, a division under the
command of the Syrian president’s brother, Maher Assad. The
nerve gas shells were fired from a military base in a
mountain range to the west of Damascus
, the TV
report said.

The
report did not state the source of its information. But
subsequently, Germany’s Focus magazine reported that an IDF
intelligence unit was listening in on senior Syrian
officials when they discussed the chemical attack. According
to the Focus report Saturday, a squad specializing in
wire-tapping within the IDF’s prestigious 8200 intelligence
unit intercepted a conversation between high-ranking regime
officials regarding the use of chemical agents at the time
of the attack. The report, which cited an ex-Mossad official
who insisted on remaining anonymous, said the intercepted
conversation proved that Assad’s regime was responsible for
the use of nonconventional weapons.

Giora
Inbar, the former head of the IDF’s liaison unit in southern
Lebanon, said Tuesday that Israeli military intelligence
made a priority of intelligence-gathering in Syria, was very
well-informed, and was widely trusted. The United States was
“aware of” Israel’s intelligence on the doings of the Syrian
regime, he said in a Channel 2 interview, “and relies upon
it.” – ‘Israeli
intelligence seen as central to US case against Syria
‘,
Times of Israel (my emph. WB)

Here’s a
Google translation of the relevant passage from the Focus
article:


Mossad: “poison gas
missile by Syrian government forces”


According to the findings of Israeli intelligence community,
Syrian President Bashar al-Assad is responsible for the gas
attack in Damascus. One unit of the Military Intelligence
Service Amam, which specializes in wireless spy “Unit 8200″,
controlled (tapped?) at the time of the gas attack, the
communication of the Syrian army. A former Mossad officer
told FOCUS, the analysis has clearly shown that the
bombardment with poison gas missiles was made by Syrian
government forces. – ‘UN
calls on Syria to allow access for poison gas inspectors
‘,
Focus magazine, 24 August 2013

I think
what’s apparent here is that Mossad used a device that is quite
common when governments/intelligence agencies want to plant a
phoney story; release it through a relatively unknown
publication and wait for it to be picked up by the MSM. After
all, if the ‘crack’ 8200 Unit was actually listening in on the
21st August “at the time of the attack” to Syrian Army radio,
why didn’t they immediately release the information to the world
(even as it happened!)? Isn’t that what you or I would have done
with that kind of war-starting information?

Then there
was the panic on Saturday 24 August by the USUK to try and get
the UN inspection team’s visit to Syria, cancelled. Now what was
that all about? The USUK backed it up with talk about
it ‘being too late’ and that the Assad regime had ‘cleaned up’
(this in an area then not controlled by the Syrian government).
Too late to find out if hundreds of

people had been gassed
?

The
sudden reversal and overt hostility toward the U.N.
investigation, which coincides with indications that the
administration is planning a major military strike against
Syria in the coming days, suggests that the administration
sees the U.N. as hindering its plans for an attack.

Kerry
asserted Monday that he had warned Syrian Foreign Minister
Moallem last Thursday that Syria had to give the U.N. team
immediate access to the site and stop the shelling there,
which he said was “systematically destroying evidence”. He
called the Syria-U.N. deal to allow investigators
unrestricted access “too late to be credible”. – ‘In
Rush to Strike Syria, U.S. Tried to Derail U.N. Probe
‘,
Gareth Porter, IPS, 28 August 2013

In yet
another version of the Mossad-inspired story, in the Israeli
Tikum Olam
we read:

It [Ynet
on the 27 August] says that three senior Israeli
military-intelligence officers are currently in Washington
briefing their U.S. counterparts on the Unit 8200
intercepts. The paper also claims that the primary evidence
the west is using on which to base its charges of Syria
government responsibility is the IDF secret intercepts. This
makes me nervous for several reasons: one, because IDF
claims are notoriously unreliable. This brings to mind the
Mossad’s notoriously biased “evidence” offered regularly to
the IAEA to “prove” Iran’s intent to develop nuclear
weapons. Two, it makes me wonder what Israel’s ulterior
motives may be in weighing in like this. –

German Report That Israel’s NSA Affirms Syria Government
Responsibility for Chemical Attacks
, By Richard
Silverstein, Tikum Olam, 26 August 2013

And what
of the UN mandate that

forbade the inspection team from apportioning blame
, should
it be able to do that? Everything looks set to fail except the
option to bomb.

Why the rush to war?

And
ultimately, why the rush to war without even falsified evidence
to offer until this late stage? Surely, if on the day of the
attack the Israelis had released the information of an alleged
gas attack by the Syrian government, it would have given the US
and the UN, every (albeit twisted) justification to attack
instead of relying on “belief” and “common sense” as Hague and
Kerry both asserted?

I never
thought I’d see the private intelligence arm of the US state,
Stratfor utter the following but I think it’s another indication
of a false flag plot gone seriously amiss that only an immediate
attack on Syria could have masked:


Stratfor’s job is to analyze the world as objectively as
possible, and the situation in Syria is among the most
difficult we have seen. The problem is we really don’t know
what happened. The general consensus is Syrian President
Bashar Assad ordered the use of chemical weapons against his
enemies. The problem is trying to figure out why he would do
it. He was not losing the civil war. In fact, he had
achieved some limited military success recently. He knew
that U.S. President Obama had said the use of chemical
weapons would cross a red line. Yet Assad did it.

Or did
he? Could the rebels have staged the attack in order to draw
in an attack on al-Assad? Could the pictures have been
faked? Could a third party, hoping to bog the United States
down in another war, have done it? The answers to these
questions are important, because they guide the U.S. and its
allies’ response. The official explanation could be
absolutely true–or not. – Stratfor Email 28 August 2013

No wonder
Stratfor is circumspect about the cause of the chemical attack.
Worse, it’s even doubting the US government when it says, “The
official explanation could be absolutely true–or not.”

If as
Gareth Porter asserts, the US wanted the inspection team
canceled because I assume, it didn’t want have to bomb them as
well the unfortunate Syrians, then it follows that regardless of
the evidence, the Empire had planned to rain death and
destruction from afar on Syria, and had

planned
to do so since last year. And then it was presented
with the perfect opportunity until those damn UN inspectors got
in the way!

Waging war
would avoid the embarrassing act of actually finding out what
went on and as we know the victor writes the history. By the
time cooler heads get to have a look at the facts, it’s all
‘history’.

READ MORE

Our Days of Noah